An exhibit can be in an EB-1A petition and still fail to answer the officer’s question. Before adding more documents to an RFE response, I would separate two problems: Was the evidence hard to find or connect to the objection? Or was it easy to find but still too thin to support the claim?
Take one objection at a time. Copy the notice’s question into a private working sheet. Add the exhibit and exact page already submitted, the fact that page establishes, and the part of the question it does not answer.
For example, a petition may claim a software contribution was adopted across a field and cite a colleague’s letter. A clearer page citation could help the officer find the claim. But if the notice asks for outside adoption, the letter alone may still leave that point unsupported. Both issues belong in the same row.
That distinction changes what to ask counsel. If the locator is weak, ask whether a more precise citation and explanation addresses the actual objection. If the proof is thin, ask what independent evidence was available at filing and what the notice permits in the response. Have qualified immigration counsel check the deadline, notice instructions, evidence timing, and legal strategy.
I put a free objection-to-proof checklist and comparison table here: https://chateb1.com/blog/eb1a-rfe-evidence-not-engaged-vs-thin-proof
This is educational case organization, not legal advice. An attached exhibit does not by itself show that the notice was wrong.